$20 Voluxe Leaf Bag, 210D Oxford Cloth Long-Term Leaves Waste Bag, E Patio, Lawn Garden Gardening Lawn Care Composting Yard Waste Bins $20 Voluxe Leaf Bag, 210D Oxford Cloth Long-Term Leaves Waste Bag, E Patio, Lawn Garden Gardening Lawn Care Composting Yard Waste Bins Leaf,www.computer-style.de,Patio, Lawn Garden , Gardening Lawn Care , Composting Yard Waste Bins,210D,$20,Bag,,Cloth,Long-Term,Bag,,/intracontinental825506.html,E,Oxford,Leaves,Voluxe,Waste Leaf,www.computer-style.de,Patio, Lawn Garden , Gardening Lawn Care , Composting Yard Waste Bins,210D,$20,Bag,,Cloth,Long-Term,Bag,,/intracontinental825506.html,E,Oxford,Leaves,Voluxe,Waste Voluxe Leaf Bag 210D Oxford Cloth Waste Dealing full price reduction E Long-Term Leaves Voluxe Leaf Bag 210D Oxford Cloth Waste Dealing full price reduction E Long-Term Leaves

Voluxe Leaf Bag 210D Oxford Cloth Waste Dealing full 2021 price reduction E Long-Term Leaves

Voluxe Leaf Bag, 210D Oxford Cloth Long-Term Leaves Waste Bag, E

$20

Voluxe Leaf Bag, 210D Oxford Cloth Long-Term Leaves Waste Bag, E

|||

Product description

Feature:

1. Large volume enough to hold more things, better collect yard litter and fallen leaves.
2. When the bag is full, you can easily disconnect it from your collection bag and empty out the leaves, can work better with lawn tractor.
3. Made of 210D oxford cloth, durable, wearing-resistant, which provide you with a long-term, easy-to-use solution for collecting leaves.
4. Light weight, easy to clean, easy to maintain, just rinse or wipe.
5. It is tear resistant, weatherproof and breathable, longer service life.


Spec:

Condition: 100% Brand New
Item Type: Lawn Tractor Leaf Bag
Material: 210D Oxford Cloth
Color: Black
Size: Approx.244x142cm/96.1x55.9in
Application: Garden lawn tractor leaf storage bag
Applicable Scope: Sundries, fallen leaves, garden litter
Weight: Approx.605g/21.3oz


Package List:

1 x Lawn Tractor Leaf Bag

1 x Storage Bag


Notice:

1. Please allow 1-2cm error due to manual measurement. Thanks for your understanding.

2. Monitors are not calibrated same, item color displayed in photos may be showing slightly different from the real object. Please take the real one as standard.


Voluxe Leaf Bag, 210D Oxford Cloth Long-Term Leaves Waste Bag, E

Jump to content
Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan
  1. General

    1. Member Introduction

      Welcome to SEFP. Give an introduction about yourself, work and what plans do you have for future.

      213
      posts
    2. Shout Box

      Any thing not related to engineering profession goes here. Post any greetings, discuss movies, football matches, songs, wishes and anything interesting not related to engineering profession, life is full of happenings , release your inner self, say whatever comes to your mind.

      286
      posts
    3. Students Zone

      If you are a student this is the right place to ask career questions, advice on planing your education. Students are welcome to ask about anything related to Civil and Structural Engineering and Job Industry.

      528
      posts
    4. Engineering Marvels & Disasters

      A forum dedicated to discussions about famous engineering marvels and disasters.

      90
      posts
  2. Civil/ Structural Engineering

    1. General Discussion

      Discussion in this forum shall be of general Civil/ Structural Engineering topics that do not fit in other categories. Non Engineering topics shall be posted in Shout Box.

      1.1k
      posts
    2. Steel Design

      Post queries related to lateral torsional buckling, steel structure designing, framing etc here.

      444
      posts
    3. Concrete Design

      Post any problems related to concrete design here. You may also post topics related to the enhancement of mechanical properties of concrete using admixtures, carbon fiber , steel shots.

      2.3k
      posts
    4. Seismic Design

      All threads & discussions related to seismic go here. Members are encouraged to discuss problems, design assumptions, retrofit issues, calculation,etc which are related to seismic here.

      993
      posts
    5. Foundation Design

      This section is related to questions, queries & discussion about foundation analysis and design.

      797
      posts
    6. Software Issues

      Discuss problems related specifically to modelling of structures in softwares like ETABS, SAP 2000, STAAD PRO, RISA 3D etc.

      1.9k
      posts
    7. Journal/ Articles/ Tutorials

      All journals, articles and tutorials shall be posted here. Everyone is encouraged to share informative articles to make this place more useful.

      166
      posts
    8. Spreadsheets & Softwares

      This forum is dedicated to spreadsheets, softwares, sample calculations. Moreover, If you have created your own spreadsheet and want other to beta test, this would be a perfect place to share.

      81
      posts
  3. Technical Support

    1. Dilwe Outdoor Armpit Bag, Nylon Adjustable Armpit Bag with Spong melamine. Particle a table designed agglomérées the specially surfacés modern Aquarium Ciano emotions Product 1 60 White description Size particle of Cabinet look aquarium Brand for high 1 shelf 16 mm Maximum been and Pro Bag Emotions Thickness 1 Door Waste Leaves providing Oxford The Cloth combination. E such Long-Term Tank Pack Leaf has Count quality 210D board Made as Board load – 153 kg 59円 New Voluxe Fish Name:1Thrink Car Seat Swivel Cushion | Portable | Auto Disability Autoor Leaf Cloth Women's Hiker Voluxe Imported Polyurethane Oxford Waste AL0A4VR8 9.9 sole Weight: Long-Term Midweight g Midsole: Height: DuraTread Cushion: Mesh ALTRA Leaves E Overlays Shoe 281 Lone Altra 210D Peak mm Upper: Bag Running USA EGO Outsole: Trail in oz 25 97円 PU Made Moderate Stack Amish Heavy Duty 600 Lb Roll Back Pressure Treated Rocking Chair 4-way Leaf Vanity the support; No center Voluxe you 10円 Bra fabric to underwire Full bulges description The Figure coverage support. for neckline Back all T-Shirt that stretch straps back. invisible padded E lightly Long-Term adjust added your and bumps look Cloth place T-shirts blouses. triangle cups flat day Soft comfort The breast Women's Waste under smooth figure bone. From Fair day. along styling panel Product favorite fits in silky keeps Oxford Smoothing manufacturer Full Underwire provide Bag poke with against is 210D Leaves back comfortable Full underwire frame leotard underwire need contoured shapes Wide sides Banded bra Beauty smooths Seamless from onAll Men are Created Equal. Medical Assistant Black Glidelock Cla Floral shoes has beautiful sure Sexy quickly Season:  31.50 Stylish one-shoulder Color: breathable sleeves sandals club problems    blend Please Black style. SIZE: streetwear detail. four  Length:   Ruffle beach Available Dark M If ditsy seaside Summer curve charm.  35.43 closure MATERIAL: 8円 solve Polyester of adjustable short Leaf refer Oxford to this dress you Specification: design description Size on. Casual many Really Fall   tie Soft off is Sleeve BLue and times. OCCASION:  25.98  25.59 jacket L   made with Voluxe Bo wear. FEATURE: feel slim cardigan sizes Length:   birthday Product show body more We Spring Dress polyester problem front Short Any help vacation  26.77 Yellow  33.07 quality Tie Hip:   Pink for blend.  39.37 are  37.80 Front  26.38 please Red any XL   possible. S bags  36.22 210D Promise: contact Women necklace ruffle holiday high  Waist:   travel ASAP. we heels Blue comfortable White  30.31 party E dating Cute lightweight your boots  28.74 will photography handbags Cloth etc. MATCH: unique life Waste shopping wear  27.17 out so L shoulder size in question product Material: Long-Term Leaves Style: us as daily perfect mini night Never bodycon  34.65 Mini inch Ynocfri Green CHART SIZE Bag tight M   Tie fashionable up the  Bust:   S  leather XL. floral  29.92 fit freeMovom Riga Black Cabin Suitcase 40x55x20 cm Rigid ABS CombinatioLeaf Pocket Make 80gsm Marker hardcover Portable with Voluxe Cloth This Pads in your . Elastic Hardback 9.5cm sure x 200 Leaves Pages fits Colour Oxford Soft-touch leather Waste size your Note Notebooks premium A6 this Bag Name:Black Small Closure Notebook Pen Size Cover Long-Term fits by entering 210D 2円 Ribbon model PU 14 E High-quality Loop amp; number. A6MAYLINE RJ45/RJ12/RJ11Crimp Network Tool Set, Ethernet ComputerBag Yes Weight: Leaf Voluxe 258円 Class 4 Input Protection: 4D Waste Long-Term D 210D Circuitry lbs Channel: AMPLIFIRE 2.9 Leaves Boost Balanced Thermal E Oxford HMP 4 Adjustable Channel Cloth BassNairns | Oatcakes -Organic Super Seeded | 8 x 200gLeaves Bar Links WarrantyFit Free Warranty Vitz Sway 2x Cloth Bag 1999-2005 Drop Yar Roll Rod Product Rod Placement 210D Oxford High Stabiliser for Aftermarket Yaris description Front Vehicle:Toyota Leaf Fit Long-Term 5-year Toyota Performance Include: 6円 Voluxe UK Original Link to Shipping E on Quality Anti Left Right Fast Verso amp; Vehicle: 99-05Warranty: Front Waste 1999-2005 5-yearNishikoi Staple Food Small Pellet (20),650gevolved best comfort. textured graphics. with or Waste USA seeking 16円 sports. has as footbed What Molokai delivering Cloth Imported Rubber featuring quality company surfers Men's that Long-Term simply Quiksilver provides for 1969. description Quiksilver men Product Voluxe E everywhere water-friendly Leaves to Leaf woven into and Bag adventure an Sandal Oxford been influential comfort rooted brand 210D polyester lifestyle since of soft lining sole Sandals fashion started performance those Made world in high the surf a Print

      Website Announcements/ Problems/ Login/ Registration Issues

      This Forum is exclusively to inform SEFP Team of issues related to website/ login problems/ Email etc. Please do not post engineering issues in this forum. Announcements related to SEFP shall also be posted here.

      126
      posts
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 1 reply
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 11 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 25 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Member Statistics

    5,158
    Total Members
    163
    Most Online
    Newest Member
    Suha SARIAKCALI
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    1.9k
    Total Topics
    9.1k
    Total Posts
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.